Our intuitive conclusion that the collapse of WT7 was the consequence of a controlled demolition has surely been confirmed by the research evidence from the University of Alaska. Although this happened 18 years ago the implications are enormous as it suggests a criminal conspiracy the scale of whose execution and concealment have been unprecedented.
After I attended a protest on Wednesday morning against having the arms fair at the Excel Centre in Newham I watched the Shadow World documentary. It’s well worth seeing the whole documentary but I pulled out this clip and it should have us asking why this terrible man Blair is still in the Labour Party and not in jail.
Here is the full video:
Last month, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs confirmed the nerve agent used in the attack was delivered in liquid form. Police had previously said they believed the pair had been poisoned at the front door of Skripal’s home as specialists found the highest concentration of the nerve agent on the door.
Almost 200 military personnel in protective suits and boots will spend months decontaminating nine sites in the town.
So the story changes again. The Skripals must have been sprayed with Novichok rather than having been exposed to it through its being smeared on their front door handle by Russians trained in the art of door knob smearing. That makes so much more sense and explains the nine hotspots. But hang on .. Were the Skripals sprayed nine times with a lethal fast acting nerve agent in nine different places or were they sprayed once and trailed the lethal fast acting nerve agent around with them to nine different places? Perhaps there was a Russian with a water pistol following them from place to place and continuially missing until that one last time. It’s a miracle no one else was harmed by this stupendeously clumsy assassin.
“Alice laughed: “There’s no use trying,” she said; “one can’t believe impossible things.” “I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”
I sometimes wonder if the point of this theatre of the absurd is to condition us to believe all the improbable and impossible arguments that the government wants to sell to us.
BTW The Wikipedia definition of ‘Theatre of the Absurd’ is jarringly relevant to our current situation:
The Theatre of the Absurd (French: théâtre de l’absurde [teɑtʁ(ə) də lapsyʁd]) is a post–World War II designation for particular plays of absurdist fiction written by a number of primarily European playwrights in the late 1950s, as well as one for the style of theatre which has evolved from their work. Their work focused largely on the idea of existentialism and expressed what happens when human existence has no meaning or purpose and therefore all communication breaks down. Logical construction and argument gives way to irrational and illogical speech and to its ultimate conclusion, silence.
While some may characterise this video as conspiracy nonsense the parts which deals with the early twentieth century up to the assassination of Kennedy are credible and informative. The thesis that American industrialists and bankers financed the rise of Nazism and benefited from both world wars is well evidenced. The following articles support this argument:
The testimony by General Smedley Butler that there was an attempted coup by industrialists against Roosevelt in 1934 shows the intention of the ‘military-industrial-financial’ complex to control government:
The conspirators included J P Morgan and Prescott Bush the father of G H Bush and grandfather of G W Bush. This article gives more background:
‘Rich Man’s Trick’ details the connections between the Military Industrial Complex (MIC), the CIA, politicians and the Mafia and argues that they worked together to end the life of an honest president who wanted to close down the CIA and end the profiteering of the MIC from engineered wars. The film’s thesis regarding Kennedy’s assassination is intricate and is well presented.
The section following the assassination of Kennedy is less detailed in presentation and thus easier to dismiss as speculative. While most thinking people now understand that the official account of what happened on 9/11 is absurd. The argument that London’s 7/7 bombings in 2005 and the Woolwich murder of Lee Rigby in 2013 with raise the hackles of many. However, despite some reservations I recommend this as an informative and thought provoking film.