On September 20th after receiving a shocking letter from the Labour Party I posted the following to Facebook:

I wrote that :

Anyone who know me would know that I would immediately, notwithstanding any contrary advice, share this communication on social media. Anyone who knows me would know that this makes me extremely angry. I don’t like me when I’m angry. I do not like being in situations that make me angry and I am considering cancelling my membership of the Labour Party. I did not join this organisation to have my legitimate freedoms of expression curtailed.


I joined in order to make common cause with those I believe are working for the wellbeing of the people of this country and everything I have expressed on social media and elsewhere has been consistent with that purpose, and has been reasoned, courteous and non-threatening. I cannot say the same of the attached communication.


I understand that this is not the fault of the many good people in the Labour Party who a fighting to change it for the better. I understand that the purpose of this kind of thing is to drive from the Party those who want to support positive change. However I have no intention of submitting myself to the indignity of any ‘disciplinary procedure’ and unless an apology is forthcoming by the end of this month I will save all concerned the bother of such a procedure by cancelling my membership.


I will continue to support the efforts of Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters to establish social justice in this country and gererally to strive for a just and peaceful world.
I addition to posting this here on my own page I will post this to the Newham Labour Forum but will understand if it is not published as it may be perceived as breaking rules.

I later wrote that:

… having slept on it, I now understand that, while everything I said above is true and the points are important, this situation is not particularly important to me unless I choose to give it importance and be stressed or insulted by it. To give it importance, to be stressed, to demand apologies etc would simply be a symptom of my own sense of self importance and colluding in giving the petty machinations of others more importance than they deserve. I am not standing for any office in the Labour Party so these sanctions have no particular effect on me. I am no longer in a huff and will not leave the party in a huff. What’s important is to work with people like you Tina who really want to make positive changes for our society, nation and world. I will continue to do that.

Today on my return for a ten day holiday abroad I found a letter from the Governance and Legal Unit of the Labour Party:

The letter had appended to it 14 Facebook posts made by me between November 2012 and April 2019. It suggests that these posts, which it terms my ‘conduct on social media’, may be in breach of ‘rule 2.1.8.’ (which it does not quote or explain in the letter). It asks essentially that I justify each of these posts without saying what they think is wrong with the posts.

These are the posts:

In an article by Gilad Atzmon published on 19th June, the Jewish Labour leader. Ed Miliband is quoted as saying at a…

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Wednesday, July 30, 2014

It's not just about winning elections … it's more important than that.

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Sunday, August 23, 2015

In this interesting article Gilad Atzmon argues that 'political correctness' operates as a form of intellectual…

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Thursday, November 1, 2018

I have to agree with most of what Gilad Atzmon says in this article but I disagree with his assessment of Jeremy Corbyn….

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Saturday, April 30, 2016

This talk by Gilad Atzmon is really interesting. Atzmon is commonly condemned as being antisemitic and a 'self hating…

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Friday, May 27, 2016

Here's a link to an interesting article that argues intelligently that terrorism and the chaos in the Middle East are…

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Zionism is to Judaism as Wahabbism is to Islam.

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Thursday, January 12, 2017

Profound. Zionism is not Judaism. It is a separate creed that is political rather than spiritual. Perhaps it bears a relationship to Judaism that is similar to the relationship between Wahaabism and Islam.

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Sunday, May 13, 2018

Is the world moving towards World War Three? A nuclear war? Someone recommended a video where David Icke, interviewed by…

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Thursday, July 24, 2014

Almost everything K said was utterly true and utterly contrary to how we actually think and act.

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Friday, May 16, 2014

Some stuff on David Icke's site related to the Savile Paedophiles in high places scandal and citing Channel Four News

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Whether Labour members should have a right to question Holocaust orthodoxy does not seem to be the relevant issue for…

Posted by Gavin Sealey on Monday, October 1, 2018

These are the questions that the GLULP asks relating to the first four items:

It seems that the GLULP finds sharing posts from Gilad Atzmon particularly problematic. Evidently I have shared a number of Atzmon’s posts over a period of seven years. I do not intend to justify the sharing of these posts or of other posts since I am not aware that sharing his posts and/or discussing them is a crime. The same arument goes for the other items that the GLULP has cited. The reason that I share articles by Atzmon is the same reason that I share articles / posts / arguments written by anyone, it is because I find them interesting and thought provoking. What is asserted in these posts may or may not be true or may or may not be well argued or evidenced but I do not believe that they are in themselves hostile or derogatory to any individual or group of individuals though they may be critical of the behaviour of individuals or groups or nations. I do not necessarily share the views of anyone whose arguments and perspectives I present in a post

I have emailed GLULP today as follows:

Re. Your Letter sent 21 October 2019

REF: L1380465
Case No: CN:- 3641

Please note that I have been out of the country since 19th October and have returned just today. I wil respond when I have had time to read your letter properly.

Having read the letter I do not intend to answer the detailed questions that it asks beyond what I have stated above with regard to my motivations. I have more important, more urgent and more interesting tasks to undertake at this time. I believe that the same will be true of the Labour Party in general.

People reading this are free to judge whether my ‘conduct on social media’ is deserving of condemnation or commendation or neither.